Skip to content

Draft

Due: Nov 17, 2024 by 11:59 p.m. Points: 80

Submit a complete, polished draft of your perspective paper in computational biology, incorporating all sections including the new "Future Directions" and "Conclusion" sections.

Instructions

  1. Length: 7-9 pages of main text (excluding cover page, tables, figures, and references).
  2. Required Sections:
    • Cover Page
    • Introduction
    • Field Overview
    • Analysis
    • Future Directions (NEW)
    • Conclusion (NEW)
    • References
    • Tables and Figures (if applicable)
  3. New Sections:
    • Future Directions (1-2 paragraphs):
      • Suggest logical next steps based on your perspective
      • Identify key research questions or hypotheses
      • Briefly discuss potential methodological approaches
      • Consider broader impacts on the field
    • Conclusion (1 paragraph, 3-5 sentences):
      • Briefly restate your main perspective
      • Emphasize key implications or potential impact
      • Provide a sense of closure
      • End with a compelling final thought or call to action
  4. Formatting Requirements:
    • Page: Standard letter-sized (8.5" x 11"), 1-inch margins on all sides
    • Font: Arial, Roboto, Helvetica, Open Sans, Verdana, or Lato
    • Font size: 12 pt for normal text, 14 pt for headings
    • Spacing: 1.5 spacing throughout the document
    • Paragraphs: Left-aligned, blank line between paragraphs, no indent
    • Headings: 14 pt, centered, concise, and bolded
    • Subheadings: 12 pt, bolded, left-aligned
  5. Cover Page:
    • Title of your paper
    • Your name
    • Course title
    • Date of submission
  6. Tables and Figures:
    • One table or figure per page.
    • Number sequentially (Table 1, Table 2, Figure 1, etc.).
    • Include original figure legend in a bordered textbox if from an article.
    • Write your own figure legend outside the box.
    • Cite the reference in the caption.
  7. References:
    • Start on a new page after the conclusion.
    • Use APA style with author-date citation system.
    • Sort alphabetically, not numbered.
    • Include DOI for every reference.

Submission Guidelines

  • Submit your draft as a PDF file.
  • Use the file naming format: LastName_FirstName_PerspectiveDraft.pdf.
  • Submit through the designated assignment link on Canvas.

Rubric

Your draft will be evaluated based on the following criteria, for a total of 80 points. Remember, this draft should incorporate feedback from previous assignments and demonstrating your ability to articulate a well-reasoned perspective.

Content and Argumentation: 40 points

Score Description
40-36 Presents a clear, original perspective with strong supporting evidence. Thoroughly addresses counterarguments. Implications are insightfully discussed.
35-32 Perspective is clear with good supporting evidence. Most counterarguments are addressed. Implications are well-discussed.
31-28 Perspective is present but could be clearer. Some supporting evidence provided. Some counterarguments addressed. Basic discussion of implications.
27-0 Perspective is unclear or weak. Limited supporting evidence. Counterarguments not adequately addressed. Limited or no discussion of implications.

Organization and Coherence: 15 points

Score Description
15-14 Excellent structure with smooth transitions. Ideas flow logically and cohesively.
13-12 Good structure with clear transitions. Ideas generally flow well.
11-10 Adequate structure but some transitions are unclear. Some ideas may seem disconnected.
9-0 Poor structure with abrupt transitions. Ideas often seem disconnected or illogical.

Writing Quality and Style: 15 points

Score Description
15-14 Excellent prose with varied sentence structure. Appropriate academic tone maintained throughout. Minimal to no errors.
13-12 Good writing quality with some variety in sentence structure. Generally appropriate tone. Few minor errors.
11-10 Adequate writing quality but limited sentence variety. Tone may be inconsistent. Several minor errors.
9-0 Poor writing quality with little sentence variety. Inappropriate tone. Numerous errors that impede understanding.

Adherence to Formatting and Style Guidelines: 10 points

Score Description
10-9 Perfectly adheres to all formatting and style guidelines.
8-7 Minor deviations from formatting or style guidelines.
6-5 Several noticeable deviations from formatting or style guidelines.
4-0 Significant deviations from formatting or style guidelines.